Shouldn't you be self-censoring what you share on your social media?
Do you think about the
repercussions of what you share on social media? A random whatsapp
video, a link on Facebook, retweeting something...it's just a second
to press the share button. But the consequences of our unthinking
actions could have very serious consequences.
CASE 1:
A couple of hours ago, I
received a video on Whatsapp. It was about a family being asked to
leave a movie theater because they did not stand up for the national
anthem. The message that came along with the video insinuated that
the people in question belonged to a minority community. I watched
the video and I didn't think I could make out which community the
people belonged to. This video is widely being shared all over as I
type this. Some astute journalists have removed the reference to
religion while a major newspaper, known for its low journalism ethics
has retained the reference in its headlines. Not standing up for the
national anthem is not a religious flaw. It's the mentality of the
person. Then why is it being made a religious issue?
CASE 2:
A few days after Ganapati
Visarjan, I received a video in which someone had filled a truck with
Ganesh idols and were throwing them into a dirty canal, in some part
of India. Yet again, this video came with a message that this deed
was done by members of a minority community. There was a major hue
and cry about this video when we ourselves immerse our God in waters
which are filled with filth and jog over his muddy remains, the very
next day. The fact that this video was shared with so much religious
fervor, it almost scared me thinking of the religious fanatics out
there.
CASE 3:
Some months ago, a woman
posted a picture of a boy in Delhi, accusing him of passing lewd
comments as she waited by the signal. Note, this was a pic and not a
video. This picture was viralled hundreds of times with people
abusing the man in the picture without a second thought. It came out,
later, that the boy was innocent and the girl had done the deed out
of some personal spat. I cannot imagine what his family would have
gone through...but by the time the boy proved his innocence, the
damage was already done. So many people mindlessly shared the
picture, unthinkingly, not bothering to even verify if it was the
truth.
CASE 4:
A social activist (anti-rape activist, who had previously been a victim of rape herself) shared a video of a woman being raped. She raved and ranted and hoped that the victim got justice. This video viralled. As all junk on internet does in today's day. But ironically, a lot of people thought that they were viralling only a pic of the perpetrators and not a video. For those people who clicked through the picture, got to see the the horrifying and disturbing act. I cannot imagine how anyone, especially someone with a history has hers, could actually upload the entire video and send it when sending a mere screen shot of the perpetrators could have sufficed.
A social activist (anti-rape activist, who had previously been a victim of rape herself) shared a video of a woman being raped. She raved and ranted and hoped that the victim got justice. This video viralled. As all junk on internet does in today's day. But ironically, a lot of people thought that they were viralling only a pic of the perpetrators and not a video. For those people who clicked through the picture, got to see the the horrifying and disturbing act. I cannot imagine how anyone, especially someone with a history has hers, could actually upload the entire video and send it when sending a mere screen shot of the perpetrators could have sufficed.
I could go on and on about
these instances but I think you get the point. Everyone wants to have
an opinion...and why not? Social media is a fantastic tool for people
to voice their opinions. Everyone wants to be a citizen journalist.
Unfortunately, like every other vocation, journalism also has it's
set of rules. In a bid to be heard, the common junta fails to follow
these.
Rule no. 1: Have you
verified the facts?
It's so easy to press the
'share' button, when a story seems titillating enough to get the
attention and likes of your friend and family. But is the story true?
In a bid to share 'popular' content on social media, are you
unknowingly ruining someone's reputation? Are you spreading religious
malice basis your personal spite?
Rule no.2: Is the
content appropriate?
Even
if what you are sharing is verified, is it appropriate? The video of
a woman being raped...a man falling to his death from a Mumbai
local...
Is
this not extremely sensitive material which needs to be nipped in the
bud?
If we
all want to be citizen journalists, we should, by all means. But at
the same time, we need to censor and monitor the material we are
sharing.
Please
check and verify what you are sharing.
Don't
be carried away by emotions and religious fervour.
Avoid
sharing anything which will hurt religious or political sentiments of
people. There's too much of hate going around the world in any case.
You don't need to add to the mayhem.
So true......wish people had more sense and thought twice before putting things up on social media....
ReplyDeleteCongratulations! Your blog post was selected for Tangy Tuesday Picks edition on December 8, 2015 at BlogAdda.
ReplyDeletePlease find it here:
http://blog.blogadda.com/2015/12/08/tangy-tuesday-picks-weekly-tangy-blog-posts
Thank you so much Team Blogadda. That means a lot!!!
DeleteI guess problem is not the medium itself but it's the people. Not everyone understands it's implications. Great post
ReplyDelete